DERMATOLOGICAL COMPOSITION OF DEODORANTS AND POTENTIAL CUTANEOUS RISKS: A NARRATIVE REVIEW AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54899/dcs.v23i86.4405

Palavras-chave:

Deodorants, Antiperspirants, Allergic Contact Dermatitis, Fragrances, Isothiazolinones, Magnesium Hydroxide

Resumo

The daily use of deodorants and antiperspirants exposes axillary skin to multiple classes of ingredients in a microenvironment characterized by humidity, occlusion, and friction, which may favor irritation and allergic contact dermatitis. This article presents a narrative review of the literature with a critical approach, addressing the dermatological composition of deodorants and analyzing the cutaneous risk profile of key ingredients in conventional formulations and emerging alternatives. Evidence indicates that fragrances, including those of natural origin, and isothiazolinone preservatives are the main drivers of skin sensitization. Vehicles and surfactants, such as propylene glycol and alkyl glucosides, may also contribute to irritation and increased reactivity, particularly under occlusive conditions. In contrast, aluminum salts remain effective in reducing sweat flow and are mainly associated with local adverse effects that can be mitigated through appropriate application techniques and formulation adjustments. Magnesium hydroxide has been described as a promising anti-odor alternative, acting through the neutralization of odoriferous compounds and pH modulation without occluding sweat ducts, with favorable cutaneous tolerability reported in the literature. In conclusion, careful selection of formulations with lower allergenic potential and proper guidance on use are essential to minimize adverse skin outcomes while maintaining effective odor control.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

Burnett, C. L., Bergfeld, W. F., Belsito, D. V., Hill, R. A., Klaassen, C. D., Liebler, D. C., Marks, J. G., Shank, R. C., Slaga, T. J., Snyder, P. W., & Heldreth, B. (2021). Safety assessment of inorganic hydroxides as used in cosmetics. International Journal of Toxicology, 40(2_suppl), 16S–35S. https://doi.org/10.1177/1091581820987448

Callewaert, C., Hutapea, P., Van de Wiele, T., & Boon, N. (2014). Deodorants and antiperspirants affect the axillary bacterial community. Archives of Dermatological Research, 306(8), 701–710. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-014-1487-1

De Groot, A. C. (2019). Contact allergy to and other adverse effects of fragrances. Dermatitis, 30(1), 1–18.

Heisterberg, M. V., Menné, T., Johansen, J. D., & Thyssen, J. P. (2011). Deodorants are the leading cause of allergic contact dermatitis to fragrance ingredients. Contact Dermatitis, 64(5), 258–264. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.2011.01889.x

Klotz, K., Weistenhöfer, W., Neff, F., Hartwig, A., van Thriel, C., & Drexler, H. (2017). The health effects of aluminum exposure. Deutsches Ärzteblatt International, 114(39), 653–659. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2017.0653

Kwong, H. L., & Lim, S. P. R. (2020). Pigmented contact dermatitis in the axillae caused by hydroperoxides of limonene. JAAD Case Reports, 6(6), 476–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdcr.2020.02.012

Liszewski, W., Belsito, D. V., & Taylor, J. S. (2022). Review of aluminum, paraben, and sulfate product disclaimers on personal care products. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 87(5), 1081–1086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2021.10.035

Loranger, C., Boulet, L. P., & Lavoie, J. (2017). Alkyl glucosides in contact dermatitis. Dermatitis, 28(1), 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1097/DER.0000000000000241

Martini, M. C. (2020). Déodorants et antitranspirants. Annales de Dermatologie et de Vénéréologie, 147(5), 387–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annder.2020.02.001

Michalak, I., Dobrzyńska, J., & Gierasimczyk, P. (2019). Application of magnesium hydroxide as a deodorant. Journal of Cosmetic Science, 70(1), 53–65.

Mori, T., Suzuki, K., Yamamoto, K., & Tanaka, M. (2020). Development of new deodorant powder by surface treatment with magnesium hydroxide. IFSCC Congress, Yokohama.

Rastogi, S. C., Heydorn, S., Johansen, J. D., & Menné, T. (1998). Deodorants on the European market: Chemical analysis of fragrance allergens. Contact Dermatitis, 38(1), 29–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.1998.tb05639.x

Svedman, C., Bergendorff, O., & Gruvberger, B. (2003). Deodorants: An experimental provocation study with hydroxycitronellal. Contact Dermatitis, 49(2), 73–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0105-1873.2003.00174.x

Teerasumran, P., Velliou, E., Bai, S., & Cai, Q. (2023). Deodorants and antiperspirants: New trends in their active agents and testing methods. International Journal of Cosmetic Science, 45(4), 426–443. https://doi.org/10.1111/ics.12863

Zirwas, M. J., & Moennich, J. (2008). Antiperspirant and deodorant allergy: Diagnosis and management. Practical Dermatology, 1(3), 39–43.

Downloads

Publicado

30-01-2026

Como Citar

Oliveira ll, F. G. B. de, Xavier, I. V., & Zuben, M. V. von. (2026). DERMATOLOGICAL COMPOSITION OF DEODORANTS AND POTENTIAL CUTANEOUS RISKS: A NARRATIVE REVIEW AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS. Revista DCS, 23(86), e4405. https://doi.org/10.54899/dcs.v23i86.4405

Edição

Seção

Artigos