POLÍTICAS PÚBLICAS PARA GOVERNO ABERTO OU POLÍTICAS PÚBLICAS ABERTAS: UMA META A SER ALCANÇADA OU UM MECANISMO DE (RE)ORIENTAR AS AÇÕES PÚBLICAS!
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54899/dcs.v22i79.104Palavras-chave:
Governo Aberto, Políticas Públicas, transparência, Participação Cidadã, ColaboraçãoResumo
O estudo tem como objetivo analisar o Governo Aberto (GA) a partir de uma perspectiva instrumental, entendendo-o como um mecanismo capaz de orientar políticas públicas por meio de seus princípios de transparência, participação e colaboração. Trata-se de um ensaio teórico, fundamentado em revisão de literatura que discutisse, de forma conceitual ou empírica, o GA e sua dimensão instrumental aplicada a políticas públicas. O referencial teórico engloba a origem, evolução, alinhamento teórico-conceitual, tendências e desafios do GA. Os resultados indicam a existência de diferentes modelos de adoção do GA, evidenciando tanto políticas voltadas para a promoção de maior abertura governamental quanto ações que incorporam seus princípios na construção de soluções públicas. A distinção entre essas abordagens ressalta a importância de indicadores capazes de avaliar o impacto efetivo do GA em diversos contextos institucionais e culturais. Conclui-se que o desenvolvimento desses indicadores e a análise de casos concretos podem fortalecer a compreensão sobre o GA e ampliar sua efetividade, contribuindo para a consolidação de um Estado efetivamente aberto.
Downloads
Referências
Ben-Aaron, J., Denny, M., Desmarais, B., & Wallach, H. (2017). Transparency by Conformity: A Field Experiment Evaluating Openness in Local Governments. Public Administration Review, 77(1), 68–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12596
Blasio, E. de, & Sorice, M. (2016). Open Government: A Tool for Democracy? Medijske Studije, 7(14), 14–31. https://doi.org/10.20901/ms.7.14.3
Calderón, C. (2012). Por qué un Gobierno Abierto. In G. Concha & A. Naser (Eds.), El desafío hacia el gobierno abierto en la hora de la igualdad (pp. 27–47). Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
Clarke, A., & Francoli, M. (2014). What’s in a name? A comparison of “open government” definitions across seven Open Government Partnership members. JeDEM - EJournal of EDemocracy and Open Government, 6(1), 248–266. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.15.2943
Cruz-Rubio, C. N. (2015). ¿Qué es (y que no es) gobierno abierto? Una discusión conceptual. Eunomía. Revista En Cultura de La Legalidad, marzo-agos(8), 37–53.
Cucciniello, M., Porumbescu, G. A., & Grimmelikhuijsen, S. (2017). 25 Years of Transparency Research: Evidence and Future Directions. Public Administration Review, 77(1), 32–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12685
Cuninghame, W. (1811). Principles of the Constitution of Governments. In James Ridgway. James Ridgway.
Dawes, S. S. (2010). Stewardship and usefulness: Policy principles for information-based transparency. Government Information Quarterly, 27(4), 377–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.07.001
Open Government Directive, 1 (2009). https://doi.org/02/12/2018
García, J. G. (2014). Gobierno abierto: transparencia, participación y colaboración en las Administraciones Públicas. Innovar, 24(54), 75–88. https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v24n54.46441
Gascó, M. (2015). Special Issue on Open Government: An Introduction. Social Science Computer Review, 33(5), 535–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439314560676
Gavelin, K., Burall, S., & Wilson, R. (2009). Open government: beyond static measures. Involve, July, 1–35.
Hansson, K., Belkacem, K., & Ekenberg, L. (2014). Open Government and Democracy: A Research Review. Social Science Computer Review, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439314560847
Hernández, M. G. (2013). No es oro todo lo que reluce: ¿qué hay detrás de las promesas de gobierno abierto en Iberoamérica? XVIII Congreso Internacional Del CLAD Sobre La Reforma Del Estado y de La Administración Pública, 15.
Ingersoll, C. (1875). Fears for democracy regarded from the American point of view. J. B. Lippincott & CO.
Ingrams, A. (2016). Assessing Open Government Performance through Three Public Administration Perspectives : Efficiency, Democratic Responsiveness, and Legal-rational Process. Chinese Public Administration Review, 7(1), 110–145.
Ingrams, A. (2017). The transparency performance puzzle: A fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis of policy failure in open government initiatives. Information Polity, 22, 25–39. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-160014
Ingrams, A. (2018). Transparency for Results: Testing a Model of Performance Management in Open Government Initiatives. International Journal of Public Administration, 41(13), 1033–1046. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2017.1318400
Lee, G., & Kwak, Y. H. (2012). An Open Government Maturity Model for social media-based public engagement. Government Information Quarterly, 29(4), 492–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.06.001
Marino, P. de B. L. P., Sucupira, G. I. C. S., Siqueira, W. R. de, & Bermejo, P. H. de S. (2017). Public Transparency in the Brazilian Context: An Integrative Review. In M. Themistocleous & V. Morabito (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing (Vol. 299, pp. 261–274). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65930-5_22
Mendoza, R. E. V. (2013). El federalismo cooperativo como factor catalizador de un Gobierno Abierto. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales, 58(219), 19–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0185-1918(13)72302-X
Nam, T. (2012). Citizens’ attitudes toward Open Government and Government 2.0. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 78(2), 346–368. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852312438783
Nam, T. (2015). Challenges and Concerns of Open Government: A Case of Government 3.0 in Korea. Social Science Computer Review, 33(5), 556–570. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439314560848
O’Reilly, T. (2010). Government as a Platform. In D. Lathrop & L. Ruma (Eds.), Open Government: Collaboration, Transparency, and Participation in Practice (Issue 1, pp. 11–42). O’Reilly.
O’Toole, L. J. J. (1997). Treating Networks Seriously: Practical and Research-Based Agendas in Public Administration. Public Administration Review, 57(1), 45–52.
OECD. (2016). Open Government: The Global Context and the Way Forward. In OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2017). Recommendation of the Council on Open Government. (Issue December).
Open Government Partnership. (2011). Open Government Declaration.
Open Government Partnership. (2016). How about defining Open Government principles?
Open Government Partnership. (2018). What is the Open Government Partnership?
Parks, W. (1957). The open government principle: applying the right to know under the constitution. The George Washington Law Review, 26(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3366/ajicl.2011.0005
Parycek, P., & Sachs, M. (2010). Open Government – Information Flow in Web 2.0. European Journal of EPractice, 9(March), 57–68.
Piotrowski, S. J. (2016). The “ Open Government Reform ” Movement : The Case of the Open Government Partnership and U. S. Transparency Policies. American Review of Public Administration, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074016676575
Piotrowski, S. J., & Rosenbloom, D. H. (2002). Nonmission-Based Values in Results-Oriented Public Management: The Case of Freedom of Information. Public Administration Review, 62(6), 643–657.
Piotrowski, S., Rosenbloom, D. H., Kang, S., & Ingrams, A. (2018). Levels of Value Integration in Federal Agencies’ Mission and Value Statements: Is Open Government a Performance Target of U.S. Federal Agencies? Public Administration Review, 00(00), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12937.Levels
The White House. (2009). Transparency and Open Government. In Federal Register (Vol. 74, Issue 15, pp. 4685–4686).
Veljković, N., Bogdanović-Dinić, S., & Stoimenov, L. (2014). Benchmarking open government: An open data perspective. Government Information Quarterly, 31(2), 278–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.10.011
Wirtz, B. W., & Birkmeyer, S. (2015). Open Government: Origin, Development, and Conceptual Perspectives. International Journal of Public Administration, 38(5), 381–396. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2014.942735
Yang, K., & Holzer, M. (2006). The performance-trust link: implications for performance measurement. Public Administration Review, 66(1), 114–126. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00560.x
Yu, H., & Robinson, D. G. (2012). The New Ambiguity of “Open Government.” UCLA Law Review Discourse, 59, 178–208.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2025 Derecho y Cambio Social
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
